« Hampton Christian Elementary school helps quake victims
Morada Middle School student remembered »

Hitchens schools a Muslim on free speech

A classic pwnage session

Duration : 0:9:16


[youtube J7aS7m3odqI]

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm and is filed under schools. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

25 Responses to “Hitchens schools a Muslim on free speech”

  1. MakeshiftEstablished on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    We usually use a …
    We usually use a different form of the word nigger. Nigga, which probably came from mispronunciation of the word nigger. It has taken a life of it’s own and is a multiple use term of endearment or scorn etc.

  2. MakeshiftEstablished on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    Certain kinds of …
    Certain kinds of abuse can bring about that type of behavior. And it was less of an assumption than me being a genuine asshole. Fight fire with fire. If you or they were offended, that sucks but just remember that “sticks and stones…” I’m not so worried about being politically correct for the sake of it or even for people’s feelings. People need to learn to accept what’s happened and learn from it. Otherwise they will stay unhealed. If you’re too nice to people they become enabled.

  3. MakeshiftEstablished on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    No, being an …
    No, being an atheist is not assumptive, it’s logical and unassuming. You can’t be assumptive about a negative. Just because you don’t believe that something exists doesn’t mean that you think there’s no possibility of it existing at all. Two statements, one is assumptive one isn’t. “I don’t believe in god/s” or “I believe there is/are no god/s” The latter is assumptive of course. Atheists are, however, the former. If there was sufficient extraordinary evidence for god then I would believe.

  4. @ …
    @MakeshiftEstablished

    Making assumptions of that character over the internet on anon is never a good idea

  5. It’s a very good …
    It’s a very good question that is asked, one that isn’t responded to:

    why did some Muslims behave in this childish manner over one set of caricatures from a internationally insignificant country, when other groups that has been MUCH more offended over a much larger timespan and by much more internationally significant countries haven’t? A good example of this is the endless anti-Semitic barrage from all over the Muslim world…

  6. RaymondCorrigan on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    OK, I wouldn`t …
    OK, I wouldn`t think highly of somebody who said it. But I would never deny them the right to say it.

    So I`m pretty much in agreement with your second comment.

  7. LOL, so the …
    LOL, so the what if I spelled it in my head. I can’t see in my posting where I object to the use of the word. All I did was point out why the media might not be so quick to throw it around everyday.

    Its perfectly fine for me or anyone else to think of black people in that sense if we choose to. I think its okay to use the word too but since it really offends others I try to limit my usage. I definitely have no reason to go crapping in other anonymous people’s cheerios either..

  8. Uhhh hummm… …
    Uhhh hummm… Islam the religion of peace is yet again attacking, burning, and destroying another city.

  9. grinningchicken on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    Hitchens is a pawn …
    Hitchens is a pawn of big business.

  10. MakeshiftEstablished on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    Oh, I’m sorry you …
    Oh, I’m sorry you were abused when you were a child. Really I feel for you. But let’s try not to dump all of our baggage on others class. That’s just not nice nor helpful.

  11. RaymondCorrigan on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    Finally I love how …
    Finally I love how it`s perfectly fine for you to count out the exact number of `*s` for N****** in your head. Meaning that you spelled out the word in your head and making people hear it when they read your comment (as opposed to using `n-word`).

    So it`s perfectly fine to you for yourself and others to think about black people using the word, as long as it doesn`t slip out of anybodies` mouth.

  12. RaymondCorrigan on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    The n-word was …
    The n-word was thrown around a lot in the movie Gran Torino. This reached a much bigger audience, in a country filled with black people. The media had little problem advertising/promoting this film.

    Even if there was outrage, would you tell the government to stop such comics from being made?

    Also, can we agree that a better analogy would be Jesus defecating on the American flag/Americans/The pope and the bible (this is religious hate speech, not racist hate speech).
    (^South Park did it).

  13. How so?
    How so?

  14. JesusSucksHorseCock on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    The only thing the …
    The only thing the Muslim accomplishes is to make Muslims look like a pack of self-righteous, whining babies who have the inalienable right to be of when someone who finds their religion to be ridiculous. His co-coreligionists are on film acting like a pack of savages when nothing happened but a few silly cartoons got published!

    New Yorkers watched their city demolished and didn’t lash out like this at all.

    Muslims are a pack of barbarians, and this Muslim makes the case!

  15. Chris Hitchens …
    Chris Hitchens shows this carpet chewing fraudulent muppet Achmed Younis for what he is.

  16. no, I just used the …
    no, I just used the example to further demonstrate that our freedom of speech can possibly threaten or anger a certain group to the point that they may radically lash back. I am very liberal in my beliefs of freedom of speech but out of respect I will sometimes temper it. I don’t think laws should force me or anyone else to do it though. People just need to grow up and not let this stuff bother them. They are welcome to use those same freedoms to combat intolerance if they wish.

  17. fuck i hate …
    i hate religion.

  18. @AntiVenomFangX
    …
    @AntiVenomFangX
    being an athist isnt being assumptive. It’s not believeing in religious claims. It was an a name made to offend the non religious. They just adopted it. Like manny black people call them selfs niggers

  19. @Stink808
    …
    @Stink808
    strawman.
    The carttoons were made to mock terrorists. You created a sonario of racial hatred. So your saying hatred of a stupid group of people who believe there god wants them to blow up is = to racism

  20. Now if you …
    Now if you substitute the mockery of Muhammed with cartoons of blacks labeled as N******, do you think the media would feel comfortable embracing that as freedom of speech? I am sure in America and alot of the west it would be a tough sell and possibly have some radical lashback as well.

  21. Leave the internet …
    Leave the internet neologisms to the professionals.

  22. yea, i believe it …
    yea, i believe it into a extent, but i don’t believe that it denounces religion, like how others try and claim.

  23. AntiVenomFangX on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    OK Mr. Deist. May I …
    OK Mr. Deist. May I ask you if you believe in evolution?

    and im not an atheist. being atheist is just as assumptive as being theist.

  24. Wow, what a trivial …
    Wow, what a trivial remark that was. That is what every atheist throws to try and justify their irrational claims about this world. (i am a deist btw.. )

  25. AntiVenomFangX on March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    you know what i …
    you know what i mean. you only pay attention to the parts of your RELIGION.

    poorly educated? do you believe in evolution? lets see how in depth your education really is.

Leave a Reply